Leadership and Communication Management

Leadership and Communication Management We entirely know how the reckoner administration body of works Without the talented actor or appropriate software, unconstipated if it is equipped with the most advanced hardware, the computer itself testament non secure any results. If we compare the computer system as Enterprise, leadership is the operator and intercourse watchfulness is one of the most efficient software. When these two crucial elements combine in a cohesive manner, the Enterprise should expect the beat out performance. R Inc. is a leading third party logistics fraternity.It offers freight imparting logistics, outsource solutions, produce sourcing, and information services among near(prenominal) other services. As an employee with five years of service, I find oneself fortune enough to work for a lodge with 100 years of history that continu exclusivelyy shows pie-eyed growth. As a non-assets company, a majority of the business is executed finished commun ication, and it exists in every aspect of R culture. Any individual at bottom the company lead spend a majority of their day communication with customers, vendors, carriers, and co-workers, so Communication management definitely plays a critical function within R company.In R, branches are small independent organizations down the stairs the corporate enterprise, and each branch has its own communication system. Within the contrastive leaderships, the style of communication varies. With my experience of having had three diametrical branch double-deckers in five years, I realize that leadership plays a critical mathematical function with communication management for the whole enterprise, and I would like to explore it more(prenominal) with my findings. Firstly, whether or not the leadership uses communication management to link employees to the company schema could construct a huge balance with the future of the enterprise.A majority of the employees will enjoy making ach ievements and receiving recognitions from their hard work. As a leader, if you do not show employees the companys vision, explain the contexts, and parcel out the strategy, it will not be easy for employees to be self-motivated and to opt into the companys strategy. They could get lost in the routine and sometimes quotidian nature of their work and not put forth their best efforts. How many times ingest you heard hatful say I retributory do the work and go home? If you are the leader, dont you want to make a difference for both the company and people you serve so that each is getting the best out of the ther? I roll in the hay honestly say that I was one of those who got lost after(prenominal) functional for 3 years without any managed communication from leadership. One day, I woke up and decided I needed to make a change. I wanted to learn something new, and I knew I didnt feel effectuate with the same grey. I chose to switch to a new branch. The new manager managed ris e up the communication and link up my career path with the company strategy. I know I trust this leader as much as he trusts me, and I do perform better with a vision. I found management does exist in the enterprise it isnt a legend found only in textbooks. This Manager introduced S.M. A. R. T goals to pee-pee the link between company goals and the employees. S. M. A. R. T means specific, measureable, attainable, relevant and time-bound. With the trendy goal, employees could work toward their own goal which is also linked to company strategy. We confidently know that we will be reinforceed through hard work with ruminate satisf feat, bonuses, raises, improved benefits, higher positions, and employee recognition. We also know that we will have all the support needed to get there. Whats the difference? Employees are linked to the company strategy sharing the mutual dream. Who makes the difference?The Leadership How can they make the difference? Use the proper communication manage ment. Secondly, communication management from leadership can modulate employees on how they make their decisions which will push the business. Employees would judge and select the most important information from leadership to make their decisions, and these decisions could affect the business in direct or indirect slipway later. With poor communication management, leaders could deliver improper information which will impact negatively on employee decisions. Undoubtedly, as a return, the decision could negatively affect the business.To connect employees decision tightly toward companys strategy, it requires leadership to manage the communication system in the right manner. here is one negative example that could prove my point In my old branch, information wasnt shared well on a level(p) basis. Sometimes, we were given two or three conflicting instructions from different team leads on the same task. Because the communication from leadership wasnt well managed, we would decide in dividually on what we feeling we were told to do or what we thought that was the easiest and best way to do.Will our decisions fit the companys strategy or benefit the best? We did not know, we were not empowered with the vision, and we could not tell whether the decision we just made was right for the company. If leadership had managed the communication, employees could have embraceed the vision and made the proper decision for the company. When all of these employees decisions are added together, it will decide the future of the company. With or without communication management from leadership to tending those decisions be determined will make a big difference in the companys future.Thirdly, Leadership has the greatest influence intimate the company, and with well managed communication, it would deliver the best results for the company. I learned the sentence elf does as Monkey sees from our 6 year old daughter. People all have the strong capability of imitation and it is ver y easy to follow the trend. Inside Enterprise, employees look up to the leadership, and any action from the leadership is really a communication to employees. How does the leader use their time? How does the leader reward the employee? All of their actions will be followed closely by employees.You will feel like qualifying to work early when you see your leader go to office at 7am every morning and work in the action area but you wont feel like going at all if your leader comes to office no earlier than 930 am and always being eludeed by his/her preferent subordinate in the locked office? You would like to make your best efforts at work when you know your leader always rewards the hard workers, but you power not feel like contributing when the reward only belongs to the ones who would surround him/ her in the locked office. I have experience with both kinds of leaders.Their style of the communication management affected business loudly in different directions. As leadership, you have to put forth efforts to manage the communication, because leadership will influence employees through their communications. To impact an employee in good or bad way, depends on how the leadership designs the communication management. Admittedly, some branches in R do not have the best designed communication management so far, some leaders have started adopting this software for their own use to optimize the system and management.Also, at the corporate level, R has a well-designed company structure to consider the success of the business it has built solid policies, procedures, and created a great working environment, and it ensures the platform for communication management ready for all branches. I commit that communication management will be very well completed at R through leadership efforts soon, and with its steady growth, it should continue to be one of their building blocks for success.