Our Practitioner Article :: Essays Papers

Our Practiti adeptr Article There is ever nearly bandwagon that education seems to wax onto. Unfortunately, sometimes when the majority is in support of the same system, in that respect is a loss of objectivity. They atomic number 18 unable to see both the good and the unsound because they argon anxious to have developed the perfect system. You dont have to be an educator, but simply a citizen who reads the newspaper or watches the news, to realize that the newest bandwagon is high-stakes exam. In fact those who are parents or have some involvement in a childs life are most likely seeing the change occurring in the school they are involved with. Some people may argue that testing has always been done. So what is different now? The difference is that now testing (in the take a leak of high-stakes testing) is leaving dangerous aftereffects. The end result that may come leaves one even much wary. So, what exactly is high-stakes testing? Is there an exact commentary? Personally we believe that one may describe what high-stakes testing is. But, it is more important and more effective to emphasize the unfair strategies high-stakes testing utilizes as well as the disturbing effects it is causing. High-stakes testing is an assessment of students, which carries beneficial consequences for students or educators. If the student passes, they proceed. If they do not pass, they must repeat the take they are currently at. Why do some people conceptualize high-stakes testing is the answer? What are the effects of high-stakes testing? Are there alternatives to high-stakes testing? Fortunately, these are some of the questions we have instituteressed in this article. High-stakes testing has been apparatused in order to raise the bar for all students and add accountability for academic performance (Tennessee Department of Education). Many states implement the tests so that they can gather information ab egress student achievement oer time. Policy makers have good in tentions in that they believe that these tests ordain alter education. The major goal and hope is that setting high standards of achievement will inspire greater effort on the part of students, teachers, and educational administrators (AERA invest statement). As stated previously, many policy makers have good intentions when they implement high-stakes testing. We are not pointing fingers at who is bad and who is good. We are simply pointing out the fact that perhaps the policy makers and society as a unscathed need to reevaluate what we want from our education system.