GP210 week 2 Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

GP210 week 2 - Research Paper Examplenalist views argue that a geological formation does not evolve or change therefore, it will always mean what it meant when it was adopted in a country (Exploring Constitutional Conflicts, 2012). With this view in mind, its interpretation essential be in line with the thoughts that the slew who came with it had in mind. These populate also argue that originalism preserves the authority of the court which is a mandatory particle in ensuring that there is the prevalence of justice in a country. Thus, this school of thought believes that the constitution must be interpreted with regard to the views of the original composers.On the other hand, those who oppose this viewpoint argue that no written constitution can anticipate the means that the government might use to oppress stack hence it is sometimes mandatory for judges to fill in the gaps that exist in the constitution through their interpretation (Exploring Constitutional Conflicts, 2012). W ith these view in mind, the constitution must be interpreted with the needs of the people it is supposed to govern in mind. In addition to this, non-originalism allows judges to rectify inflexible interpretations that no longer serve their original purposes (Whittington, 2001).The need to amend or possibly revoke bad laws that exist in the constitution will be realized with continual originalist interpretations. Other than leave courts to continuously find transformation in the constitutional provisions, the people concerned will be obliged to come up with a new constitution that best suits the needs of people.However, coming up with a new constitution is a costly affair and this is the reason why non-original interpretations should be given way. Moreover, they will allow for more initiate understanding on contemporary issues such as equal treatment of blacks, women and other minority groups (Whittington, 2001).With these views in place, it is clear that non-originalist interpret ations of the constitution are more favorable. Apart from