Child Nutrition Act of 1966 and Wic Analysis

Child keep actuate of 1966 and WIC Analysis a. How effective is the policy is in terms of solving the accessible problem. The Child bread and butter Act of 1966 has since formed and developed many schedules to a first gearer place it to aid those in poverty. The five top producing programs under the Child Nutrition Act in fiscal course 2010 include the adjunct Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the subject field give instruction Lunch Program, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), the Child and Adult C are Food Program, and the School Breakfast Program.WIC serves 45-50 % of all infants born in the United States (Facing Hunger in America, 2011, para. 3). accord to Kowaleski-Jones & Dun bottomland (2002), much of the research on the effects of WIC participation on children has focused on the potential benefits of change magnitude use of prenatal care, increased Medicaid savings, better infant tabucomes, and less infant mo rtality. In addition to the previously stated, WICs effectiveness can be supported by the scholarship of WIC Works, (Kowaleski-Jones, & Duncan, 2002).The observation that WIC works, is driven by the great deal of research for WIC partakers to pay wellnessier offspring (Kowaleski-Jones, & Duncan, 2002). For example, each dollar spent on WIC relieve the state at least $1. 77 to $3. 13 in health care costs (Bitler, & Currie, 2004). According to Public Health Nurse supervisory program Luzette Samargia, of Duluth, Minnesota, WIC is effective and produces positive outcomes (Facing Hunger in America, 2011, para. 11).Luzette manages about 27 human race health nurses and 3 dieticians, who as part of their jobs are highly proficient to provide WIC health checks, breastfeeding encouragement, nutrition counseling for mothers and their young children, and appropriate WIC food for thought vouchers (Facing Hunger in America, 2011, para. 7). According to Luzette WIC has generally not been fo und to importantly change food patterns of participants or to reduce the incidence of obesity. Thus, WIC programs are increase their focus on nutrition education.And in 2009 the WIC nutrition advice and foods available with WIC vouchers were completely updated in accordance with current USDA guidelines. For example, WIC vouchers whitethorn now be used for fresh fruits and vegetables, more whole-grain products are required and only milk with 2 percent or lower fat content is accepted for women and children age 2 and older (Facing Hunger in America, 2011, para. 12). WICs final stage is not to end poverty and solve all problems amongst it. WICs declare oneself is to aid those in need and supplement their nutritional prerequisites.Breastfeeding an infant is decisive to a newborns development, yet not everyone has this knowledge. WIC does offer free infant practice to its participants but strongly encourages mothers to breastfeed. b. Describe the policys strengths and boundarys Lim itations involved when discussing WIC can be drawn to breastfeeding rates. Because WIC provides free infant formula, breastfeeding rates pass on been a hot topic amongst WIC participants. However, according to the guinea pig WIC Association breastfeeding rates have slightly risen in recent brotherly classs.In the year 2004, approximately 55% of mothers participating in WICs benefits were breastfeeding in the year 2010 rates had increased to over 60% ( guinea pig WIC Association NWA, 2011). An additional limitation involved with WIC is of course funding (Mahoney, 2008). Each year Congress authorizes middling how much of funding will be allotted for the WIC program (Mahoney, 2008, pg. 4) According to the USDA They requested $6. 1 billion for the WIC Program for fiscal year 2009, a 1. 3% increase from fiscal year 2008.This request was establish on projected increases in participation and food costs, and the USDAs proposal to limit nutrition services, cut administrative costs, and to restrict eligibility for Medicaid recipients a proposal rejected by Congress for fiscal year 2008 (Mahoney, 2008, pg. 4). With splashiness rates continually on the rise and because WIC is not an entitlement program, if funds are not available eligible participants at nutritional risk may not receive the appurtenant nutrients as they have in the agone (Mahoney, 2008, pg. 5).In contrast to limitations WIC also has much strength. In atomic number 49 alone, according to the National WIC Association in the fiscal year of 2011 167,875 women, infants, and children participated (National WIC Association NWA, 2013, pg. 1). WIC is preparing ways in which women can avoid the long lines, the stigma, and hassle when purchasing nutritious foods. Indiana is currently preparing plans in converting the WIC program to the Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) by 2020 (NWA, 2013, pg. 2) c. Who gains and who loses as a result of the policy? . Are there good deal in need who are left out? Who is le ft out? WIC serves a tightly-defined population strictly low to moderate income, nutritionally at-risk great(predicate) women, breastfeeding women, non-breastfeeding postpartum women, infants, and children up to their fifth consumeday (Facing Hunger in America, 2011). Participants of WICs family members may benefit from participation, yet if you were not mentioned previously you may be left out from receiving WIC benefits. e. Is the policy addressing only a portion of a larger issue?What is the larger issue? f. Does the policy improve fond well-being? Explain in detail. g. Does the policy advance the cause of social and economic justice? References Bitler, M. , & Currie, J. (2004, June). Does wic work? The effects of wic on pregnancy and birth outcomes. Retrieved from http//www. econ. ucla. edu/people/papers/currie/more/prams. pdf Facing Hunger in America. (2011, June 23). Wic works. Retrieved from http//facinghungerinamerica. blogspot. com/2011/06/wic-works. hypertext markup la nguage Kowaleski-Jones, L, & Duncan, G. (2002).Effects of participation in the wic program on birthweight Evidence from the longitudinal slew of youth. American Journal of Public Health, 92(5), 799-804. Retrieved from http//www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447164/ Mahoney, M. (2008). The special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, & children (wic) Opportunities to influence participants health in Minnesota. Tobacco Law Center. Retrieved from http//phlc. stylefish. com/sites/default/files/resources/phlc-policy-wic. pdf National WIC Association. (2011). Advocacy action center.Retrieved from http//www. nwica. org/? q=advocacy/1 National WIC Association. (2013, January). How wic impacts the people of Indiana. Retrieved from http//www. paramountcommunication. com/nwica/Indiana. pdf National WIC Association. (2011, no.ember). Wic funding What does sequestration mean for wics future? Retrieved from http//www. paramountcommunication. com/nwica/WIC requisition. pdf Neuberger, Z. (2013, March 5). Sequestration could deny nutrition deny up to 750,000 at-Risk low-Income women and children. Center and work out and indemnity Priorities.Retrieved from http//www. offthechartsblog. org/category/food-assistance/child-nutrition-and-wic/ Neuberger, Z. , & Greenstein, B. (2013, March 5). The impact of the sequester on wic 575,000 to 750,00 eligible low income women and children at nutritional risk could be denied benefits. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from http//www. cbpp. org/files/2-26-13fa. pdf Studymode. (2010, February). Social welfare Wic schema. Retrieved from http//www. studymode. com/essays/Social-Welfare-Wic-Schema-285472. html Whaley, S. E. , Koleilat, M. , Whaley, M. Gomez, J. , Meehan, K. , & Saluja, K. (2012). Impact of the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. American Journal Of Public Health, 102(12), 2269-2273. doi10. 2105/AJPH. 2012. 300770 Wolf, J. (n. d. ). Wic Women, infants, & children. Retrieved from http//singleparents. about. com/od/financialhel1/p/wic. htm U. S. Department of Agriculture. (2011, March). The food assistance landscape. (Economic Information Bulletin No. 6-8). Washington DC Economic Research Service. Retrieved from http//www. ers. usda. gov/media/129642/eib6-8. pdf